Selling links on your own site: the risks for publishers

Selling followed links or unlabelled sponsored posts breaks Google's link spam policy and can bring a manual action for unnatural links from your site. Selling labelled advertising with a sponsored or nofollow attribute does not. Here is what publishers risk and how to sell safely.

In short

  • Google's spam policies, last updated in August 2026, define link spam as links to or from a site, and name selling links for ranking purposes as an example.
  • Google's manual actions help page describes a specific penalty for publishers, triggered by a pattern of unnatural, artificial, deceptive or manipulative outbound links.
  • The fix Google gives is to remove the paid links or change them so they no longer pass PageRank, then request a review.
  • Selling placements is allowed when the links carry a sponsored or nofollow attribute, and advertising law separately expects paid content to be labelled for readers.
  • ESBO's September 2026 analysis of 16,625 publishers found that 57% of publishers at DR 80 or more state that they use a sponsored label and that 39% of them sell nofollow placements only.

Selling advertising on your site is safe. Selling followed links is not. Google’s spam policies, last updated on 28 August 2026, define link spam as creating links “to or from a site” to manipulate rankings, and list “buying or selling links for ranking purposes” first among the examples. A publisher that takes money for links that pass ranking credit breaks the same policy as the buyer.

The difference between the safe and unsafe version is small and technical: a label for readers and an attribute on the link. This lesson explains what a publisher risks, how sellers get noticed and how to take sponsorship money without putting the site in danger.

What Google’s rules say about the seller

Three passages apply directly to publishers. We read all three pages on 4 October 2026.

The policy. The link spam section names exchanging money, goods or services for links, and “advertorials or native advertising where payment is received for articles that include links that pass ranking credit”. It also names “text advertisements or text links that don’t block ranking credit”. The full list is in what counts as link spam.

The exception. The same section says buying and selling links “is a normal part of the economy of the web for advertising and sponsorship purposes” and is not a violation when the links are qualified with rel="nofollow" or rel="sponsored".

The penalty. Google’s manual actions help page lists “Unnatural links from your site” as its own manual action. The description reads: “Google has detected a pattern of unnatural artificial, deceptive, or manipulative outbound links on your site.”

A manual action is applied by a human reviewer at Google and shows in the Manual Actions report in Search Console. For this one, Google’s help page gives three steps:

  1. Identify any links on your site that were paid for or that appear to violate the link spam policy.
  2. Either remove these links, or change them so that they no longer pass PageRank.
  3. When the site is no longer in violation, select Request Review.

In practice step 2 means adding a sponsored or nofollow attribute to every paid link, across the whole archive. The help page says most reviews take “several days or weeks” and that link-related requests may take longer. Google link penalties and recovery covers the process in detail.

The help page does not say how much ranking a site loses under this action, and Google has published no figure for how often it is applied.

A manual action is the visible outcome. The more common one is silent. With its December 2022 link spam update, Google is reported to have said that its SpamBrain system detects both sites that buy links and sites used to pass outgoing links, and neutralises those links.

For a seller, that removes the product. Buyers pay for links that pass credit. Once a site’s outbound links are discounted, the placements are worth nothing to buyers who check results, and nothing tells the publisher it has happened.

There are also reports of traffic damage. An Ahrefs article refers to a tracked sample of more than 40,000 link-selling sites that reportedly lost substantial traffic after Google’s March 2024 updates. The original dataset was not verified in our research, so treat that as a report, not a measurement.

Google does not publish how it identifies sellers. What we can describe is how buyers identify them, because careful buyers screen for the same signs. Our lesson on how to vet a publisher lists them from the buyer’s side. From the seller’s side they read as a list of footprints:

  • A public “write for us” or “advertise” page with a price list.
  • Categories that cover everything: business, health, technology, casino, CBD.
  • Articles on topics unrelated to the site, each with one commercial link.
  • A high share of outbound links with exact-match commercial anchors. One 2026 practitioner guide treats 60% or more as a red flag. That is a rule of thumb, not a Google threshold.
  • Five to fifteen posts a day across unrelated subjects.
  • The domain appearing on circulated seller spreadsheets and on several marketplaces at once.

BuzzStream’s June 2026 study of roughly 257,000 guest post sellers rated 96.2% as low quality and found that 39.6% had no organic traffic. That is where a site ends up when selling becomes the business.

What it does to the site itself

Policy is only part of the cost. Every paid guest post on an off-topic subject makes the site less useful to its real readers. Buyers send articles written to carry a link, not to be read. Once the site is on seller lists, the inbox fills with offers at lower and lower prices.

Then there is the law. Advertising rules in the US, UK and EU expect paid content to be identifiable as advertising, and the publisher shares responsibility with the advertiser. Paid link disclosure law sets out what the regulators’ pages say.

What the top of the market does

ESBO’s September 2026 analysis of 16,625 publishers, reported by Entrepreneur, shows that the strongest sites sell differently. Among publishers at DR 80 or more, 57% state that they use a sponsored label, against 15% at DR 30 to 39. And 39% of publishers at DR 80 or more sell nofollow placements only.

These publishers sell an audience. The advertiser pays for readers and brand exposure, and the link attribute is not negotiable. That model survives any Google update because it never depended on passing ranking credit.

How to sell without breaking the rules

Practice Compliant version
Sponsored article Labelled as advertising at the top, links marked rel="sponsored"
Banner or text advert Link marked sponsored or nofollow
Affiliate links Marked sponsored, with a disclosure readers can see
Product sent for review Disclosed, and the link qualified if the product was given in return for it
Guest contributions Accepted on editorial merit, no payment, links only where they help the reader

A few working rules, drawn from practice:

  1. Publish an advertising policy that states sponsored content is labelled and links are qualified. It filters out buyers who want a hidden link.
  2. Keep an editorial bar. Refuse topics you would not otherwise cover.
  3. Price the audience, not the metric. Quote on traffic and readership, not on Domain Rating.
  4. Record every paid placement with its URL and date, so you can change attributes across the archive in one pass if you ever need to.
  5. Check your outbound links regularly. Links you did not place can mean the site was compromised.

If you sell through a marketplace, the same rules apply to every offer you list: state the attribute and the label in the listing. On WhitePress, for example, publishers set their own prices, as our desk review of WhitePress records, and the link marketplaces page explains the model.

The attribute values themselves are explained in nofollow, sponsored and ugc.

When not to sell at all

Do not sell followed links on a site whose organic traffic pays the bills. The income per link is small against the value of the rankings you put at risk. Do not rent sitewide footer or sidebar links, which the policy names as “widely distributed links in the footers or templates”. And do not let third parties publish whole sections on your domain for a fee without reading the site reputation abuse policy first.

Terms such as manual action and sponsored attribute are defined in the glossary.

Common questions

Is it against Google's rules to sell links on my site?

Selling links that pass ranking credit is. Google's policy says buying and selling links for advertising is not a violation as long as the links are qualified with a nofollow or sponsored attribute.

What is an unnatural links from your site manual action?

It is a penalty applied by a human reviewer at Google when a site shows a pattern of manipulative outbound links. It appears in the Manual Actions report in Search Console.

Can I sell sponsored posts safely?

Yes, if the post is clearly labelled as advertising for readers and its links carry the sponsored or nofollow attribute. The price is usually lower than for a hidden followed link.

How does Google know a site sells links?

Google has not published its methods. Buyers spot sellers through public price lists, off-topic articles and commercial exact-match anchors, and it is reasonable to assume the same signs are visible to Google.

How do I recover if my site is penalised for selling links?

Google's help page says to identify the paid links, remove them or change them so they no longer pass PageRank, and then select Request Review in Search Console.

Vendors to look at

  • BazoomEditor's pick

    Sponsored content and link marketplace, managed service

  • MotherlinkEditor's pick

    Backlink services, guest posts, niche edits, full SEO